Thread:Roosevelt the Hunter/@comment-4059927-20180814151336/@comment-31129923-20180817094833

Okay, that really widens the conflict. As you stated, it's the complete polar opposite of what Bill wants for the community. Despite the fact that he has a low opinion of the town, he believes he has an obligation to prevent something like that from happening in his district, though not in a noble sense. Mostly because it's a personal issue since the purpose of his school solution is to strengthen his own image. Other than that, he seeks to maintain his seat in Congress on his own terms: it doesn't not re-elect him unless he chooses to leave it.

I did some quick reading on municipality secession (I actually live in a county where an event like that historically happened) and found out that a move like it can be proposed by the county's board of comissioners. In order for it to happen though, the town would have to vote on it in the election cycle. Also, I'm thinking Bill further opposes Matthew's plans when he decides he wants to pursue the possibly making Bullworth Academy a charter school, thus making it truly within his juristiction.

In the case of Michael, knowing he'll be pretty eager to assist Bill in his campaign against his father, does he take Bill's side because he's the lesser of two evils or just because it's an opportunity for him?

Another thing I'd like to add is that I like how before this, Bill and Matthew come in looking down upon one another but both know very little about each other's overall influence.