Thread:SodaCat/@comment-34814-20180605191518/@comment-2173402-20180606203941

I don't understand how someone can look through five edits and decide someone has autism. That's not how it works. Sometimes it takes years to diagnose autism in children by people who are with them every day.

Vandalizing is one thing, the apologies suggest she knows how we feel about these things and that they are wrong. A typical symptom of autism is not understanding how others feel, why something is wrong, and no apologies.

Besides. They weren't all "good faith"--some were straight up gibberish. How that classifies as someone trying to edit well, by slamming their hands down on the keyboard and clicking publish? I'd understand someone adding in irrelevant information, but a keyboard slam hardly seems like a reasonable attempt.

I don't see the point in giving her more chances, and I don't really think Wikia is going to help, anyway. If everyone else wants to give her a chance, I won't argue, but personally, I'm all for just blocking her if she pops up again.